Services

Less chasing.
Clearer handoffs.

Four ways to connect ordinary operational work. Each starts with your existing process, an agreed outcome and a check that the proposed connection is suitable.

Enquiry handoffs

A request arrives, but ownership, missing details and the next action live in separate places.

The useful change

Map one agreed business-enquiry source into an existing tracker; apply owner rules, identify retries and conflicts, and route incomplete records to a named reviewer.

What you receive

A traceable enquiry record with an owner, next action and visible exceptions.

Try the fictional example

Before it can work

  • Business-only input or authorised export
  • Stable event IDs and agreed duplicate rules
  • Named owners and tracker access

The human decision

Staff confirm ambiguous requests and approve any outgoing response.

Outside this starting point

  • Candidate or sensitive-data intake
  • Automatic qualification or pricing decisions
  • Automatic sending
A narrow source-to-tracker handoff may fit the pilot after intended-tool tests; a new CRM or multi-channel consolidation does not.

Onboarding and handover checklists

An agreed job moves forward while ordinary setup information, responsibilities or approvals are still missing.

The useful change

Turn one approved onboarding form or tracker event into the agreed checklist, assigning setup tasks and leaving missing information visible.

What you receive

A checklist linked to the original request, with accountable owners and unresolved items.

Try the fictional example

Before it can work

  • Client-approved checklist and trigger
  • Required fields and responsible owners
  • A permitted tracker and bounded project type

The human decision

The project owner checks completeness and authorises the next stage; checklist completion is not contractual acceptance.

Outside this starting point

  • Identity verification or legal review
  • Employee onboarding or candidate screening
  • Credential collection and automatic account creation
One reusable checklist in one existing tracker may fit; bespoke project planning, migrations and access provisioning require separate scope.

Approvals and follow-up drafts

Teams chase a decision without a clear record of what was requested or whether the latest response is an approval.

The useful change

Read an agreed status export, identify records due for human review using explicit rules, and prepare follow-up drafts referencing the current record.

What you receive

A review queue and unsent drafts; contradictory or missing statuses stay flagged.

Try the fictional example

Before it can work

  • Agreed statuses and review dates
  • Explicit approval authority
  • Current source records and safe draft destination

The human decision

A person checks recipient, context and wording and decides whether to send. Silence is never treated as consent.

Outside this starting point

  • Inferred approval from sentiment or silence
  • Automatic external messages; recurring reminders require separate scope and remain under human control
  • New quotes, discounts or payment commitments
One status-based draft queue can be assessed for the pilot; reconciling many inboxes and channels needs a separate assessment.

Routine operational reports

A weekly update requires copying tracker rows, reconciling statuses and checking which records need attention.

The useful change

Use one agreed tracker export, validate supported fields, count explicit statuses and list blocked or unrecognised records with source IDs.

What you receive

A reproducible status summary and exception list from the supplied snapshot.

Try the fictional example

Before it can work

  • Consistent record IDs and status vocabulary
  • Known reporting period and snapshot owner
  • Agreed counting and duplicate rules

The human decision

The owner checks the snapshot date and unresolved records before sharing. A status count does not prove delivery performance.

Outside this starting point

  • Financial or regulatory reporting assurance
  • Forecasting or individual productivity scoring
  • Inventing progress from missing updates
A bounded report from one tracker may fit the pilot; multi-system analytics, real-time dashboards and forecasts need separate scope.

A starting point.
Not a bundle.

The £450 pilot covers one agreed workflow after feasibility. These four service families are possible starting points, not four systems included in one fee. Wider integrations, several inputs, new platforms and ongoing support require their own assessment and price.

Read the fixed scope

A clear next step

Tell us about
one workflow.

What comes in, where should it go,
and who needs to act?

Discuss the handoff hello@workpassage.co.uk

A short outline is enough. Please leave passwords and private records out of an initial email.